Historical Background Village of Euclid v. Western Title Insurance Company 40 Cal. Universal Pictures 2nd Cir. Marketability of Title 4 Plaintiffs first contend the policies in the instant case expressly insured that title to the subject property was marketable and, since the presence of hazardous substances on the property impaired its marketability, defendants were obliged to pay cleanup costs. Remedies for Breach of the Sales Contract Jones v. Superior Court, Cal.
Liberty National Enterprises, L.P. v Chicago Title Insurance Company
Dollinger tendered a claim under the Chicago Title policy due to the failed sales transaction for parcel 7. The Partielly Action was not covered by the insuring clause of Liberty's policy. We must still examine the policy language for a determination of coverage. In connection with this acquisition, plaintiffs purchased title insurance from Chicago Title Insurance Company Chicago Title. The real property which is the subject of this case comprises approximately 30 acres of land near the Guadalupe River in Santa Clara County. In early October , plaintiffs acquired lot 1 of the property from KSI. We rely on donations for our financial security.
Lick Mill Creek Apartments v. Chicago Title Insurance Co | Casebriefs
CLTA policies insure primarily against defects in title that are discoverable through an examination of the public record. The Court of Appeal stated as follows:. Peter VT and notes, pages Note: In the instant case, however, no third party holds a right or interest in the subject property. Aesthetic Regulation State ex rel. The Mechanics of Adverse Possession Howard v.
Miscellaneous Quiz Random Miscellaneous Quiz. Insureds cannot rely on a court finding that deleting an exception or an exception to an exclusion provides affirmative coverage. Your Account Isn't Verified! The trial court determined, based on undisputed facts alleged in the complaint, that title insurance policies issued by defendants did not provide coverage for the costs of removing hazardous substances from plaintiffs' property. Moreover, Liberty says, the Partiellys' assertion of a quiet title claim was evidence that they did not concede Liberty owned percent title. AZ and notes pages Note: